Developing a Greener Resilient Microgrid: Not Impossible, but Difficult

Share Button

The industry is trying to create a greener resilient microgrid, but it’s not easy, as Concord Engineering’s Michael Boswell explains.

resilient microgrid

Michael Boswell,
VP, distributed generation, Concord Engineering

Solar has been and continues to be an anchor renewable energy distributed energy resource (DER) for microgrids. But the shortcomings of photovoltaic (PV) solar as a DER that actually contributes to resiliency are annoyingly self-evident: Suffice it to say that when the sun doesn’t shine, or the grid goes down, PV solar alone isn’t contributing much of anything useful toward resiliency. And there is, of course, the amount of real estate required to generate meaningful volumes of electricity. All of that aside, PV solar is currently, without argument, the greenest widely available and affordable DER.

But back to resiliency. Maybe battery storage gets added into the PV solar microgrid. Battery storage coupled to PV solar provides the technical means to seamlessly transition to an island microgrid if and when the grid goes down, and it can give some added heft to smooth out some of the other disagreeable technical characteristics of PV solar — such as susceptibility to being yanked around by the host electrical loads. But for how long can the battery discharge and at what cost? An old mentor of mine used to say, “I can solve any problem you have if it takes all the money you got.” That was always good for a nervous chuckle, but shortly thereafter, we would have to get on with solving the problem at hand.

Extended discharge time for batteries is expensive, and there is, of course, the tricky calculus of sizing the available PV solar to charge the battery while simultaneously carrying the load of the microgrid. One can also add in load shedding and load management, and the design and operations get a bit more complicated. But the real complication is not the technology. It is all there, ready and proven. The primary complications are the economics – but that is a topic for another day.

Let’s put aside the PV solar concepts discussed above and perhaps agree that, for now, the most practical DERs for resiliency are arguably combustion or chemical platforms such as IC engines, combustion turbines or fuel cells — which, with the exception of a microgrid closely coupled to a renewable fuel source, leaves these DERs fueled with a fossil fuel. This contributes to resiliency, but not so much to the “greening” of the microgrid.

A fully green microgrid is a difficult proposition, and the costs to achieving net zero carbon imprint are not trivial, but the trends are toward lower costs.

So, what does that leave us for a resilient microgrid that is of low or zero carbon imprint? The most practical near-term solution is perhaps to simply purchase solar or wind renewable energy credits (RECs). In this case, the “greening” of the microgrid is through a contract for the attributes of a renewable or low carbon fuel to be used by the fossil fuel burning DER. The most prevalent means to adopt this strategy is by purchasing renewable natural gas (RNG) by way of contracting for a volume of RNG having been assigned a renewable identification number (RIN).

Energy Bank

shutterstock.com

Much like a solar or wind REC, RNG would be generated and injected into a distribution pipeline, contributing to a benefit that is transferred through a contract recognizing and monetizing that benefit — the so-called RIN.

Hydrogen or hydrogen blended into natural gas is a possibility and the market and technical trends are toward greater market penetration, lower costs and contract mechanisms similar to RINs that make hydrogen a renewable fuel for the distributed energy resources viable.

One could, of course, also purchase carbon offsets to mitigate the carbon generated by burning fossil fuels within the boundary of the microgrid. But, to some, carbon offsets may lack the transparency of being linked directly to the fuel source, even if the link is a transaction.

Finally — though a bit of an outlier, at least for now — is fuel cell carbon capture. There are multiple possible iterations of this concept, but, simply put, fuel cells would be designed as part of the DER mix with the fuel feed stock consisting of natural gas, RNG or hydrogen blended natural gas. The greening occurs through the capture of carbon and either sequestering, selling or using CO2 as an industrial gas. This concept has a great deal of merit in the food and beverage industries. Additional flexibility can be designed into this process by using flue gas from a boiler or even IC engine DER. This technology and application are not yet mature, but certainly has promise.

A fully green microgrid is a difficult proposition, and the costs to achieving net zero carbon imprint are not trivial, but the trends are toward lower costs. And, simply put, a microgrid has more flexibility to a site host valuing resiliency and lower carbon impact than what can be achieved by the grid alone.

Michael Boswell is VP of distributed generation projects at Concord Engineering

Share Button
Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest microgrid news and analysis.

Comments

  1. “An old mentor of mine used to say, “I can solve any problem you have if it takes all the money you got.” That was always good for a nervous chuckle, but shortly thereafter, we would have to get on with solving the problem at hand.”

    That is the bottom line, how much do you want to pay for resiliency? Burning fuels, be it nuclear or fossil fuel has its pros and cons. Emissions is the fossil fuel Achilles heel for fossil fuels, thousands of years of toxic waste and what to do with it will follow nuclear fission around when a site is decommissioned. There’s a lot of reckoning coming in the next couple of decades. Putting in over designed solar PV arrays on one’s roof, a large energy storage system with grid ‘interactive’ inverter(s) seems to be a good all around plan.

    The electric utilities are trying their best to dilute the value of residential solar PV with tiered electricity rates, after solar PV peak generation time of day, TOU or demand charges tacked onto each kWh of electricity used and PSPS events where power may be off for days trying to prevent wild fires. The question more, where do you want to spend your money? Infrastructure, generation replacements or one’s own grid agnostic system?

  2. I am shocked at this article since my company has done over 68 microgrids all over the world. While they are a mix of technologies, they almost always have photovoltaics and battery storage. Since wind usually blows at night is a very good augmenter, and in many cases biogas, propane, freeflow hydropower, waste heat-to-electricity, or even legacy old diesels if they are at the site and can work. Since solar is everywhere (which is why we can grow food everywhere) and renewables do not have a supply chain which can be disrupted, or susceptible to bribes to access timely supply (which is prevalent all over the wold), The users have never experienced any outages or failures and they ALL pencil out quite competitively. I see the article looking backward, not towards the emerging reality of the marketplace. — Scott Sklar, President, The Stella Group, Ltd. E-mail: solarsklar@aol.com – The Stella Group, Ltd.. is a strategic technology optimization owner’s rep firm for clean energy users and companies, with a focus on system standardization, modularity and web-enabled diagnostics. Scott Sklar is an Adjunct Professor at The George Washington University teaching three unique interdisciplinary sustainable energy courses, and an Affiliated Professor with CATIE, an international graduate university in Costa Rica offering graduate degrees on sustainability. Sklar is the Energy Director at GWU’s Environment and Energy Management Institute (EEMI).

Leave a Comment

*