Long Beach Says California Decision Fails to Remove Key Barrier to Microgrids. Calls for Rehearing

Feb. 23, 2021
Long Beach, California has filed a formal challenge to a recent microgrid decision by state regulators saying that the order does not reduce the barriers to microgrid development to the extent required under state law.

The city of Long Beach has filed a formal challenge to a recent California microgrid decision, saying that the order does not reduce the barriers to microgrid development to the extent required under state law.

The city is calling for a rehearing on the January decision by the California Public Utilities Commission to create microgrid tariffs and undertake other efforts to advance microgrids. The proceeding emerged out of a state law, SB 1339, designed to boost commercialization of microgrids.

Long Beach said the decision does not fulfill the law’s mandate, citing its failure to remove restrictions that delayed construction of a Port of Long Beach microgrid. The microgrid is part of an effort to fully electrify the port’s marine terminals to achieve zero emissions by 2030.

The port also is planning additional microgrids, according to the city’s February 22 filing with the commission. (Rulemaking 19-09-009)

The filing said that the solar plus storage microgrid experienced delay and “near death” as a result of what’s known as Rule 18, which prohibits a Southern California Edison customer from reselling electricity received from the utility. 

Clear and present barrier

“Rule 18 is a clear and present barrier to microgrid development. In fact, as demonstrated by the port’s microgrid experience, it is potentially fatal to development of microgrids and to the power systems resilience needed at electrified, zero-emissions marine terminals,” said the city, acting on behalf of the Board of Harbor Commissioners.

At issue is the fact that the energy storage systems within the microgrid are partially charged by utility power and sold to a private entity at the port.  

“In situations where a microgrid includes a storage facility charged by a combination of electricity received from an investor-owned utility (IOU) and electricity received from the microgrid’s own generator, the IOU can (and did so in the port’s microgrid experience) assert that the electricity withdrawn from the storage facility cannot be resold to another party. This is because there is no practical way to differentiate the electrons withdrawn from the storage facility that came from the IOU from the electrons which came from the microgrid’s own generation,” said the filing. 

Microgrid decision did not resolve  storage issue

The commission did make some changes to Rule 18 but they did not resolve the crux of the problem, the city said. “Absent from the decision is any explanation as to how a microgrid, even if it meets the other criteria of the decision, can utilize storage to serve another entity,” said the filing.

The city is asking the commission to add language to Rule 18 that would make exceptions for energy withdrawn from an energy storage device by the owner or operator of a microgrid. The recommended language includes protections against overcharging customers and maintaining safety standards.

The Port of Long Beach was able to overcome its issues by negotiating a waiver with the utility. But the city described the waiver as ad hoc and said a more global solution is required.

The port awarded Schneider Electric a $5.2 million contract in 2018 to build the project, which includes a solar array, battery storage and diesel generator.

Microgrid necessary for reliable power

The port, which accounts for nearly one-fifth of containers moving through US ports, says the microgrid is necessary to ensure reliable power as it increasingly electrifies its operations.

Electricity demand at the port is dependent on arrival times of ships, which are unpredictable because of weather, cargo handling times at other ports and other factors. The port needs to be sure reliable electricity is available for the ships because delaying them at anchor is “cost prohibitive,” said the filing. 

“In addition vessels often carry perishables that cannot be delayed from delivery. A port which cannot promptly off load vessels will quickly be bypassed by shippers which will direct their vessels to other ports. This will, in turn, adversely impact jobs at the port, which are an important part of local and regional employment.”

The port’s microgrid is designed for the Port’s Joint Command and Control Center, which manages response and surveillance operations.

That microgrid will also have a low-voltage cable between the control center and Jacobsen Pilot Service, which is responsible for shepherding ships into the harbor. During power outages the microgrid will provide electricity to the control center and JPS. Under normal conditions, the microgrid will be used to shave peak load demand and provide demand response services. 

Track news about the Port of Long Beach microgrid. Subscribe to the free Microgrid Knowledge Newslettter. 

About the Author

Elisa Wood | Editor-in-Chief

Elisa Wood is an award-winning writer and editor who specializes in the energy industry. She is chief editor and co-founder of Microgrid Knowledge and serves as co-host of the publication’s popular conference series. She also co-founded RealEnergyWriters.com, where she continues to lead a team of energy writers who produce content for energy companies and advocacy organizations.

She has been writing about energy for more than two decades and is published widely. Her work can be found in prominent energy business journals as well as mainstream publications. She has been quoted by NPR, the Wall Street Journal and other notable media outlets.

“For an especially readable voice in the industry, the most consistent interpreter across these years has been the energy journalist Elisa Wood, whose Microgrid Knowledge (and conference) has aggregated more stories better than any other feed of its time,” wrote Malcolm McCullough, in the book, Downtime on the Microgrid, published by MIT Press in 2020.

Twitter: @ElisaWood

LinkedIn: Elisa Wood

Facebook:  Microgrids

Related Content

Brandon Olafsson / Shutterstock.com

Department of Energy Spending Up to $200M Connecting Remote Microgrids

March 15, 2024
The U.S. Department of Energy is currently accepting proposals for transmission projects that would connect remote and isolated microgrids to each other or to existing transmission...
U.S. Army photo by Scott Darling, Fort Cavazos Public Affairs)

U.S. Army Improves Resilience at Fort Cavazos with New Microgrid

March 14, 2024
U.S. Army Garrison-Fort Cavazos, formerly known as Fort Hood, will use the microgrid to power critical services and infrastructure during outages and to reduce energy costs during...

Reducing Costs and Uncertainty in Microgrid Deployment By Employing An Integrated Solution

March 15, 2024
This white paper - the second in a series - explores the Model Predictive Controller (MPC) approach to Microgrid and EV infrastructure operation.

Malaysian Semiconductor Maker Secures Critical Power with Rolls-Royce mtu Powerpacks On-Site

March 13, 2024
X-FAB Sarawak, the Malaysian division of worldwide foundry group X-FAB, will utilize the four mtu Kinetic Powerpacks at its site in Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. The company manufactures...

Only through Standardization Can Microgrids Accelerate the Energy Transition

Jan. 18, 2024
Jana Gerber, North America microgrid president at Schneider Electric discusses how standardizing microgrids will accelerate the energy transition.

Mgk Dcf Wp Cover3 2023 01 09 10 34 33
Mgk Dcf Wp Cover3 2023 01 09 10 34 33
Mgk Dcf Wp Cover3 2023 01 09 10 34 33
Mgk Dcf Wp Cover3 2023 01 09 10 34 33
Mgk Dcf Wp Cover3 2023 01 09 10 34 33

Data Center Microgrids: Implementing Your Microgrid

Beyond providing energy resilience, a microgrid brings additional energy management, cost and sustainability benefits. These features are making microgrids increasingly attractive...