How to Make FERC 2222 Work for Microgrids

Share Button

FERC 2222 presents promise  — but also challenges — for the US microgrid industry, according to energy policy experts who spoke this week at Microgrid 2020 Global, a virtual onference that attracted more than 4,300 people.

FERC 2222

Image by WDCPhotographer/Shutterstock.com

The federal order, expected to pave the way for aggregated distributed energy resources (DERs) to compete with traditional power plants in wholesale markets, was frequently referenced by speakers throughout the three day event, signaling its significance to microgrids. The order aims to eliminate the barriers that prevent DERs from competing on a level playing field in organized markets.

During the panel, “The Future of Microgrid Markets,” speakers said they’re cautiously optimistic about the potential effects of FERC Order 2222.

“I think it was a prudent thing for FERC to do, but now we also have to see what happens at the state level. And finally, I would say there are all the operational issues,” said Norman Bay, a former FERC commissioner and head of the energy regulatory group at Willkie Farr & Gallagher.

He asked how the industry will ensure that the Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) have enough visibility into what’s happening at the distribution level — and vice versa.

Now that the order is in place, RTOs must make compliance filings, he said. The stakeholder process at the RTOs is important. but it’s a difficult and involved process, and many stakeholders, including state regulators, can’t participate in a meaningful way.

“And yet they’re very important because as we know, the proverbial devil is in the details,” he said.

He’s hoping that the industry will avoid a repeat of what happened in PJM territory, where the energy storage rule for the capacity market involved a 10-hour duration requirement. “It’s just not a good decision from PJM. That’s created this barrier to participation.”

Shaping the FERC 2222 rules

It’s important that microgrid companies and firms creating microgrid components get involved and try to shape the rules that emerge in RTO markets as a result of FERC Order 2222, Bay said.

The states also have an important role to play. The FERC order carved out interconnection, cost allocation, reliability and safety issues that need to be addressed by states. That makes sense because DERs are located at the distribution level, he said.

“So do states proceed in good faith with respect to those requirements that they impose at the distribution level, or do they do things that basically make it impossible for these resources to participate in the wholesale markets?” he asked

Marissa Gillett, chair of the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA), said that as an economic regulator, she wants DERs to be brought to scale in the most cost effective way possible and doesn’t want Connecticut ratepayers “overincentivizing anything.”

Free Resource from Microgrid Knowledge Library

Energy-as-a-Service Municipal Microgrids
California’s Critical Facility Challenge: The Case for Energy-as-a-Service Municipal Microgrids
If California does not modernize its grid and power delivery infrastructure via sustainable premium power provided by microgrids, the state will be thwarted in its efforts to meet not only its economic and public safety needs, but aggressive carbon reduction and renewable energy goals. Download the new white paper commissioned by Schneider Electric that answers one of the most commonly asked questions: How can today's governments pay for the vital energy infrastructure upgrades they need? Enter Energy-as-a-Service municipal microgrids.
We always respect your privacy and we never sell or rent our list to third parties. By downloading this White Paper you are agreeing to our terms of service. You can opt out at any time.

Get this PDF emailed to you.

She said she’s “cautiously optimistic” that FERC Order 2222, along with FERC Order 841, which gave energy storage a big boost, will knock down barriers and allow for microgrids to scale in New England.

Challenge to state commissions

However, participating in the RTO stakeholder groups poses a challenge for state commissions.

‘I think it has to be recognized that state commissions don’t necessarily, especially in Connecticut’s case, have the resources to adequately staff these regional stakeholder groups nor do we have official seats at the table,” she said. It’s up to the commissions and stakeholders to keep each other informed about developments and the need for commissions to participate.

“So I’m cautiously optimistic, but also cautious that stakeholder processes at the regional level can be difficult for us to engage in and have our voice meaningfully heard,” she said.

Microgrid 2020 Global

Speaking at Microgrid 2020 Global: Matt Roberts, Microgrid Knowledge; Marissa Gillett, Connecticut PURA; Norman Bay, Willkie Farr & Gallagher; Eric Coffman, Maryland Energy Administration

Eric Coffman, director of energy programs with the Maryland Energy Administration, said that like Gillett, he’s “cautiously optimistic” about FERC Order 2222 and also concerned about the state’s ability to participate in the discussion.

“You always feel a little bit of that strain as to whether you can engage. But we see there’s some opportunity here,” he said.

He suggested that states in similar situations get involved and stay involved in the process.

“Figure out what this means to you and what you’re trying to achieve,” he said.

Looking to the future, Gillett said that by 2030, policies such as FERC Order 2222, will give way to well-defined markets so that states can start to reduce incentives and DERs can stand up for themselves.

Educating regulators

Bay said that if barriers to participation in markets are removed, DER projects will move forward. As an example of DERs participating in wholesale markets, he cited Sunrun’s successful offer of residential energy storage into ISO New England’s capacity market.

To continue this trend, regulators need education from industry players to help them move the microgrid market along, said Gillett.

“The regulators are only going to create policies and react to what’s in front of them. Providing resources and education and innovative ways for us to think through these things is not unwelcome.”

Added Bay, “If I had any advice for companies out there, for the microgrid industry, it would be not to short change the policy or regulatory side of things.” If the industry can work with regulators on policy, it can help move the microgrid market forward.

“If you were to ask me whether I’m bearish or bullish on DER and microgrids, I would tell you I’m very bullish,” he said.

Track news about FERC 2222. Subscribe to the free Microgrid Knowledge newsletter.

Share Button

Comments

  1. “Now that the order is in place, RTOs must make compliance filings, he said. The stakeholder process at the RTOs is important. but it’s a difficult and involved process, and many stakeholders, including state regulators, can’t participate in a meaningful way.”

    The way rule 841 and now rule 2222 ‘reads’, it sounds like FERC is being pushed as the wholesale electricity market provider for the Nation and arbiter of distributed micro-grids that can be something designed for a city or a home. Does this give FERC the “right” to run the wholesale market Nation wide? Indeed, what would happen to the RTO entities?
    Then there’s this contrary ‘ruling’ of the MOPR in PJM territory that seems to “prefer” fueled generation over renewable energy generation.

    • The ruling of the MOPR in PMJ is on the right track. It is about time that all energy sources compete on a level playing field. Subsidizing solar and wind is completely destroying the energy market. Why can’t the solar and wind market grow up and stand on their own two feet.? Monopolies are simply not in the best interest of the public. Then, maybe, the public can enjoy the clean, base-load, 95% capacity factor energy that comes from nuclear power, especially next generation nuclear power.

    • Nuclear ‘sounds’ good at first blush and IF you don’t mind ignoring the actinide containing sarcophagus found on the 97 remaining nuclear plants in operation. So far, the NRC is looking at some SMR technologies, but has not permitted the building of such technology. Some of the SMR reactor technologies could use the stored “Spent fuel rods” and use them for fuel of the new SMR. Downside, there will be hundreds of these SMR constructed around the U.S.. When you get to end of life of these reactors that will have ‘components’ will be radioactively hot for centuries or more. So what do you do? Have spent end of life reactors standing like the actinide albatross around the necks of the next three generations, waiting for a “cure”? The MOPR is an end run around FERC rule 841 and FERC rule 2222.

  2. Steven Curtis: The MOPR allows old assets that are not economical to become ‘subsidized’ by the Minimum Offer Price Rule. Who sets that rate? PUC or CCs of each State? PJM, or FERC? You say Solar PV and wind are subsidized, when will they stand on their feet alone. Fossil Fuels and nuclear have been getting subsidized considerations for over 80 years in the tax laws and the industry is ubiquitous over 150 years of operations. The question to you is , when will the 150 year old FF driven electricity industry that’s been around for 120 years itself, be able to stand on its own? The MOPR is a stumbling block to cheaper forms of energy and a more robust grid infrastructure.