It’s Hard to Quantify the Value of Resilience Accurately, but California is Trying

Share Button

Creating an electric resilience metric is an important goal for the microgrid industry, and it is part of an effort by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to speed the deployment of microgrids.

electric resilience

By ra2 studio/Shutterstock.com

As part of the overall effort — prompted by SB 1339, which requires regulatory changes to support microgrid development — the CPUC Resiliency and Microgrid Working Group (RMWG) is looking into various ways to quantify the value of electric resilience.

Most recently, the working group looked into an electric resilience metric often used by regulators and utilities — the Interruption Cost Estimate (ICE) calculator — and learned that it needs to be updated, especially for outages that last more than 24 hours.

Joe Eto, staff scientist with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, said during a RMWG meeting last week that the calculator is used in rate cases across the country to identify the costs associated with power outages and to put a price on the value of avoiding outages.

The lab is now seeking information to update the ICE calculator with more recent data because the existing data on which the calculations are based is outdated.

How electric resilience is measured now

As it stands now, the ICE calculator puts a price on the cost of outages, based on customer group, time of day and length of outage.

For example, the ICE calculator says that for a 1-hour power outage in the afternoon, the cost for medium and large commercial and industrial customers is $20,360.

Utilities are being asked to help fund additional work on the calculator, which would result in a new metric in two to three years, said Eto. The US Department of Energy, which originally funded the ICE calculator, has said the upgrade to the ICE calculator is not within its budget.

The RMWG workshop, held May 12, is part of the CPUC’s microgrid proceeding, which was initiated in 2018 by SB 1339. The measure directed the CPUC, in consultation with the California Energy Commission and California Independent System Operator, to develop policies related to microgrids. As part of the rulemaking, the CPUC organized the working group, which explores, among other issues, standardized metrics for measuring the value of resiliency and reliability.

Learn more about the economics of resilience and microgrids at Microgrid 2021: The World Awakens to Microgrids. Special sessions are devoted to the costs, savings and earnings of microgrids on May 18 and May 20.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is planning to develop survey questions about “long duration outages” — those which last for more than 24 hours — and use the answers to update the equations that underlie the ICE calculator, said Eto. The surveys on which the ICE calculator are now based are up to 20 years old, and they aren’t statistically representative of all areas of the US, he added. And they’re not appropriate for estimating the cost of outages that last for more than 24 hours. Once the ICE calculator is updated, it will continue to be a public domain tool.

Right now, the ICE calculator is used around the country, mainly in rate cases, to demonstrate the value of utilities’ proposed distribution investments aimed at improving reliability.

Free Resource from Microgrid Knowledge Library

Third-Party Ownership Models for Microgrids
Think Like a Financier to Win Funding for Your Microgrid Project
Get the new special report that lays out how investors and other financiers think about energy projects. The aim is to help move a microgrid from the drawing board to reality by preparing engineering firms, developers and project sponsors to think like those in the lending community. 
We always respect your privacy and we never sell or rent our list to third parties. By downloading this White Paper you are agreeing to our terms of service. You can opt out at any time.

Get this PDF emailed to you.

Not only are the surveys underlying the ICE calculator based on old data, they were also conducted when no one worked from home, said Eto. This means they don’t reflect changes in how residents use electricity, including the use of computers and other electronics.

And the ICE calculator is not appropriate for longer outages in part because the calculator doesn’t reflect the costs of business outages that affect the supply chain.

For example, if a product manufacturer loses power and is unable to make shipments to other companies that need that product to create their own products, the other manufacturers also suffer from the outage.

“The supply chain effects are impossible to estimate by only asking one customer,” Eto said.

ICE resiliency metric

Image courtesy of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Hard to quantify societal value of a microgrid

In response to a question from a participant at the RMWG meeting, Eto noted that microgrids offer benefits to the people and companies that are connected to them. “People who benefit from microgrids are those being served by the microgrid,” he said. But focusing solely on those people and companies doesn’t account for the broader benefits to the rest of the grid. “Those are trickier to quantify,” he added.

“To the extent that facilities being supported by a microgrid have broad societal benefits — keeping a police station or hospital energized — that’s a consideration.” This underlines the limitation of metrics like the ICE calculator, according to Eto. “In the rubric of minimizing societal costs, the societal costs are costs that need to be considered when looking at microgrid investments,” he said.

The goal of placing value on resiliency is to minimize the total societal costs of providing reliable power, he said. And distributed energy resources and microgrids can play a role in that effort. Electric distribution systems could be augmented by investments in distributed resources either by customers or by utilities. “It doesn’t matter which side of the meter the investments are on,” said Eto.

Research shows electric reliability degrading

More people are now paying attention to the more frequent and prolonged storms, floods, wildfires and other disasters that are devastating some areas. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory looked at utility data over the last 15 years and concluded that reliability has been worsening over time.

“That decrease in reliability is correlated with bigger storms and severe weather, and these events are why we’re seeing more discussion around resilience. Now people want to do something,” Eto said.

Track news about efforts to quantify electric resilience. Subscribe to the free Microgrid Knowledge Newsletter.

Share Button

Comments

  1. Also as you inferred cost savings in putting a lower demand on the existing feeders from utility, that also allows for more resilience. By lowering demand the utility becomes more resliant to outages. Offset the burden to the microgrid community and work with them to seamlessly integrate with utility power. This takes us to building cooperative and strength to meld our core strength and power as human beings first, starting with our elderly and native population central, and secondly as a nation of people.

  2. Also as you inferred cost savings in putting a lower demand on the existing feeders from utility, that also allows for more resilience. By lowering demand the utility becomes more resliant to outages. Offset the burden to the microgrid community and work with them to seamlessly integrate with utility power.

  3. “For example, the ICE calculator says that for a 1-hour power outage in the afternoon, the cost for medium and large commercial and industrial customers is $20,360.”

    Just ask those victims of the Camp Fire in California in the town of Paradise. A small off grid system that would have allowed a booster pump to push water from the domestic water line to a couple of sprinklers thrown on the roof of the homes in Paradise, could have greeted their owners to a standing home instead of a scorched earth lot. Like ERCOT in Texas, yeah, don’t need cold weather hardening on gas generation resources, until it happens. One blurb a couple of days after stated ERCOT which represents 80% of the electricity in Texas, was just about 4 minutes and 30 seconds from (total collapse) during this ice storm. Could this be why some folks at ERCOT and the PUC aren’t there now? In places like California it is predicted between 2025 and 2030, SCE and PG&E will be around $0.30/kWh to $0.35/kWh on average. Utility SDG&E is predicted to be on average $0.47/kWh. At this price point it will become, if I can afford my own micro-grid, it will be I cannot afford to (not) have my own micro-grid.