California Opens ‘Diesel Alternative” Discussion in Microgrid Proceeding

Share Button

California regulators are seeking comment from industry stakeholders on alternatives to diesel generators as part of an ongoing microgrid proceeding (19-09-009).

microgrids

By ymgerman/Shutterstock.com

The California Public Utilities Commission seeks comment by September 18.

The state’s largest utility, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), had originally planned to develop clean energy microgrids for the 2020 wildfire season, but abandoned the plan out of concern about the cost and complexity of building microgrids in a highly compressed time frame. 

Instead, PG&E pursued a plan to lease 350 MW of temporary diesel generators for up to 63 substations.

Now the commission is considering how it might replace the diesel generators for 2021. But a recent workshop held on the topic concluded with no clear path forward. This indicates that that alternatives to diesel might not be ready for 2021, either, and a longer term plan might be necessary, the commission said.

In a September 4 posting, the commission offered a proposal for stakeholder comment that would allow utilities to again lease diesel generators for 2021 as long as they meet a series of requirements, among them compliance with local air quality rules for prime power.

Utilities also would submit detailed plans for microgrid pilot projects at up to three substations “to start the transition toward cleaner energy.” 

The proposal calls for the microgrids to meet various standards, among them:

  • Cost no more than $500/kW-year (a high estimate for diesel reservation and operation costs)
  • Be capable of black start and islanding for 48 hours
  • Begin operating by October 2021 or June 2022
  • Meet various air emissions requirements

For beyond 2022, the proposal lays out an application process that would require utilities to show how they will minimize temporary generator use over 5-10 years and transition to clean generation.

With both blackouts and wildfire-related power shutoffs occuring in recent weeks, several stakeholders are urging the commission to move more quickly on microgrids. The commission is currently considering a microgrid tariff and other approaches to incentivize microgrid development.

Google told the commission that the state needs a “more ambitious vision for the commercialization of microgrids,” arguing that the technology is well beyond the utility pilot stage. Google pushed for more incentive for private development of microgrids.

“In Japan, for example, there has been widespread development of microgrids by nonutility enterprises under a ‘National Resilience Program” launched by the national government in the aftermath of the 2011 earthquake and tsunami. In Australia, a government commission has considered widespread development of  ‘Stand-Alone Power Systems,’ including microgrids, and has endorsed changes to the regulatory framework to facilitate development of such systems by third-party, non-utility enterprises,” Google wrote in comments filed August 28.

Free Resource from Microgrid Knowledge Library

Energy-as-a-Service Municipal Microgrids
California’s Critical Facility Challenge: The Case for Energy-as-a-Service Municipal Microgrids
If California does not modernize its grid and power delivery infrastructure via sustainable premium power provided by microgrids, the state will be thwarted in its efforts to meet not only its economic and public safety needs, but aggressive carbon reduction and renewable energy goals. Download the new white paper commissioned by Schneider Electric that answers one of the most commonly asked questions: How can today's governments pay for the vital energy infrastructure upgrades they need? Enter Energy-as-a-Service municipal microgrids.
We always respect your privacy and we never sell or rent our list to third parties. By downloading this White Paper you are agreeing to our terms of service. You can opt out at any time.

Get this PDF emailed to you.

“In contrast, the IOUs – Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG&E”), Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (“SDG&E”) – tend to characterize microgrids as if they involved an emerging, untested technology,” the tech giant said.

In its filing, Bloom Energy said that the California commission is “center stage with the authority and opportunity to provide the leadership necessary to navigate these immensely challenging times. The commission should meet this moment and provide a clear path forward to enable Californians a better way.”

Read more articles by Microgrid Knowledge about the California microgrid proceeding, Rulemaking 19-09-009.

Share Button

Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest microgrid news and analysis.
Elisa Wood About Elisa Wood

Elisa Wood is the chief editor of MicrogridKnowledge.com. She has been writing about energy for more than two decades for top industry publications. Her work also has been picked up by CNN, the New York Times, Reuters, the Wall Street Journal Online and the Washington Post.

Comments

  1. We are a company that has patented and developed several patented technologies to clean and improve fuels for #electricitygeneration, industrial and commercial applications. We could immediately reduce 20-30% #SOxcompliance, #NOxReduction, #COxReduction, while reducing #sootreduction and #CarbonBlack up to 80%. We have a bridge technology for the customer, save money and impact the environment immediately until the new carbon free technologies are installed.

    #Waterinfuelemulsions are approved by most engine and #boilermanufacturer, including #Wartsila, #Caterpillar, #CleaverBrooks, among others. This system protects the engines by reducing repairs due to the reduction in temperature. In addition, it extends engine overhaul intervals, and reduce the use of #urea and overall operating costs.

    Re-Synth’s patented system reduces emissions in liquid fuels such as: D2 – #Diesel, D4, D6, #Bunker, #FuelOil, #marinefuels. Re-Synth’s system creates stable #fuelemulsions. Re-Synth has successfully added 20-30% of water into the fuel and keeping the #fuelefficiency at 100%.

    The water in oil emulsions have been approved by the #EPA, #DOE, #CoastGuard and most manufacturers of engine, boiler and oven used in the #electricitygeneration.

    Regards,

    Antonio Colón
    Chief Operating Officer

  2. “Instead, PG&E pursued a plan to lease 350 MW of temporary diesel generators for up to 63 substations.”

    The point here is not so much the diesel generators, but the operation of such units under CARB air regulations that allow only so many hours of operation on diesel. The other problem, when PG&E invoke a PSPS, how long will it last? Most self contained diesel generators can do about 10 hours of near full load with a 500 gallon tank. IF the PSPS covers several areas of the grid and multiple generators are running for days, does PG&E have the service vehicles available to keep the generators running for the duration of the PSPS?

    All I see this ‘doing’ is costing the ratepayers $11 million a year and another rate increase, more in fuel and somewhere along the way, PG&E will be paying fines to CARB for lengthy run times.

    “For beyond 2022, the proposal lays out an application process that would require utilities to show how they will minimize temporary generator use over 5-10 years and transition to clean generation.”

    When this is proposed, it is only allowing PG&E to charge customers another $11 million dollars a year more and continue on the path of using the PSPS for 5 to10 years more instead of system hardening and resiliency.

  3. Bloom Energy Always On Microgrids is the solution. Google was Bloom’s first customer, so they know how well Bloom Servers work. So glad to see Google advocating, perhaps with their influence, the California Commission will give up on their unfair assault on Bloom, because they just don’t like natural gas, but diesel is ok for them. What?

    Please Google, do something powerful now !

  4. Don’t see how a Natural Gas fuel cell that is on and emitting GHG for several thousands of hours is a good alternative for 48 hours of diesel generators. Sounds more polluting and more expensive so maybe the California Commission gets the idea of run hours. If Google was an advocate they would buy directly instead of trying to make PG&E buy.

  5. ALTOHES GREEN ENERGY POWER PLANT

    With the new turbine technology we have developed, 1 MW ALTOHES Pumped Hydroelectricity 7/24 Productıon 7.700.000 kWh / Year. No need to store energy.

    ALTOHES Power Plant does not require long transmission lines and can be built in the city area.

    WORKİNG PRİNCİPLE OF THE POWER PLANT
    Altohes technology The plant generates 3 MW energy and uses 2 MW of the energy produced for its pumps and supplies 1 MW for external use.
    In the first movement of the plant, 6 minutes of energy is supplied from the mains or generator. It is ensured that the upper pool and pipes are filled with water.

    When energy production starts, the electronic system automatically cuts off the external energy and the power plant uses 3/2 of the energy produced and the power plant is put into the energy production cycle.

    EFFİCİENCY TECHNİCAL DESCRİPTİON: Code: 980-100
    ALTOHES Code: 980-1000 Power Plants will be used, Code: 960 1.120 and Code: 960 2.280 2 turbines will fall from 30 meters. It will produce 3,400 kW (mechanical) power with 4.8 tons of water per second.
    ALTOHES Code: 980-1000 power plant, 3.4 MW generation power produced by it, it consumes 1.12 MW part for alternator, it consumes 2,28 MW part for its pumps and it gives 900 kW energy to external usage.
    160 m2 gross open area and h 38 mt height are required.

    The production capacity of the power plant will be designed according to the demand. With the combination of many units, power plants can be established with great power.
    ALTOHES Code: 980-1000, 1 MW Power Plant investment amount 2.2 million Euro

Trackbacks

  1. […] In the end, Track 1 resulted in a compromise: The CPUC ruled that any diesel generator solutions must be temporary and are to be replaced by adequate renewables-driven solutions in 2021. More recently, lack of progress at the CPUC seemed to indicate that even this plan may be derailed. […]

Leave a Reply to ML Cancel reply

*