California Pays DERs Too Little in Attempt to Curb Blackouts

Share Button

A decision from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) that aims to reduce the potential for blackouts because of hot weather this summer falls short for distributed energy resources (DERs) in California, industry members said.

blackouts

By Monster Ztudio/Shutterstock.com

The ruling, “Decision Directing Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company,” directs the utilities to take action to prepare for potential extreme weather in the summers of 2021 and 2022 (20-11-003). Approved March 25, the ruling focuses mostly on expanding utility demand response efforts, including incentives for rate-based utility programs.

“Overall, the decision is underwhelming for third party demand response,” said Matt Duesterberg, co-founder and president of OhmConnect, which aggregates storage, microgrids and customer appliances and offers them to the market.

A separate part of the decision implements the Emergency Load Reduction Program (ELRP), which is available to third parties.

The ELRP takes a small step in incentivizing the use of DERs to help avoid blackouts this summer. It provides distributed energy with the same payment made to traditional resources for doing so.

Small win for microgrids

“It’s a small win for microgrids and DERs, a step in the right direction,” said Samantha Reifer, director of special projects at Scale Microgrid Solutions.

Under the ruling, those eligible for the ELRP include virtual power plants, third party distributed resource providers, and nonresidential customers and aggregators who are not participating in demand response programs. The California Energy Storage Alliance successfully argued for including behind the meter solar plus storage, vehicle-to-grid resources and other distributed energy resources, according to the proposal.

Providers will be compensated at a rate of $1,000 per MWh, but industry members thought $2,000 per MWh would be more appropriate, said Reifer.

“This starts to move the needle in terms of creating value for DERs to be more on par with other resources,” said Duesterberg. DER providers such as OhmConnect will be paid the same amount as operators of coal power plants in Utah selling into the California market. But OhmConnect won’t get any credit for being local or carbon-free, he said.

The amount of power OhmConnect, Scale Microgrid Solutions and others provide is determined in advance. However, if DER operators can provide more than the prespecified amount — or net qualifying capacity — when the utility is short of power, they will get paid for that. “DERs have more variation in how much they can create,” said Duesterberg.

Join us for “Crunching the Numbers on Microgrids,” a panel discussion May 18, 1 p.m., at Microgrid 2021. Industry experts will explore such issues as geographic cost differences, generation choices, controller sophistication and financial benefits offered by wholesale market opportunities, load management and demand response.

“Under this ELRP, we’ll get paid for whatever we deliver beyond the specified amount,” Duesterberg said.

Free Resource from Microgrid Knowledge Library

Third-Party Ownership Models for Microgrids
Think Like a Financier to Win Funding for Your Microgrid Project
Get the new special report that lays out how investors and other financiers think about energy projects. The aim is to help move a microgrid from the drawing board to reality by preparing engineering firms, developers and project sponsors to think like those in the lending community. 
We always respect your privacy and we never sell or rent our list to third parties. By downloading this White Paper you are agreeing to our terms of service. You can opt out at any time.

Get this PDF emailed to you.

DER operators can deliver more than expected because they may be aggregating resources that produce more than they agreed to, he explained. For example, OhmConnect customers — homeowners whose DERs the company aggregates — can deliver more, depending on their power needs on the day of the event. Operators of natural gas plants, on the other hand, can’t exceed their stated capacity.

Both Duesterberg and Reifer said that the CPUC ruling may open the door for increased use of natural gas and diesel generators that will emit carbon and other types of pollution.

“If you have a gas generator behind the meter, you can use it during these events to keep the lights on. It’s good to keep the lights on but goes against the goal of renewables. It would be better to allow DERs to thrive so you don’t have to rely on gas generators,” said Duesterberg.

Riefer said she understands that using diesel in the short term would be better than a blackout and added that fossil fuel use is supposed to be a last-ditch option. Even with natural gas and diesel generators in the ELRP, the effort may lead to lower emissions by avoiding blackouts. This is because so many people use diesel generators during blackouts, she said.

“California has been sold out of diesel generators for the past three years. The generators are emitting an insane amount of carbon,” Reifer said. “But if this program reduces the need for rolling blackouts, the hope is we would use less diesel than during blackouts.”

RPS-like standards for DERs?
DERs

By gopixa/Shutterstock.com

The March 25 CPUC decision aside, both Duesterberg and Reifer hope to see measures that incentivize microgrids and other distributed energy resources. 

“We want better incentives for DERs,” said Duesterberg. His company would like to see a measure for distributed energy resources that’s similar to solar renewable portfolio standards (RPS). “Our goal is to get 20% of resource adequacy coming from DERs. When there’s no sun or wind, DERs can step in and fill the gap.”

In addition, under the ELRP, OhmConnect would prefer no cap on the amount of capacity distributed energy resources can provide. The ruling now imposes an 8.3% cap on how much DER suppliers can contribute. “Instead of relying on gas generators, we could increase the cap. We pushed for that in this ruling and didn’t get it,” Duesterberg said. “There’s a cap because regulators don’t understand the resources. This is the challenge DERs face. They’re scary for the regulators.”

OhmConnect also argues that third parties should have access to utility data in order to provide their services. In addition, the utilities should be held accountable for not providing the data, if, for example, they take their websites offline, which is what Southern California Edison did for two weeks recently.

“That stops the flow of data to customers and third parties managing customers’ energy,” said Duesterberg.

Stop chipping at resilience

Reifer said she would like to see California take a more holistic approach to providing resiliency. Right now, the state is trying to chip away at the problem in a piecemeal manner, with numerous dockets. The CPUC should open a docket that looks at grid resilience in general, she said.

Helping the state avoid blackouts is a tricky juggling act between ensuring resilience while adding clean energy. And the state has more work to do to strike a balance, according to  Duesterberg.

“At a high level, it comes down to two things: Keep the lights on and get to 100% clean energy,” he said.

Track news about microgrids and DERs. Subscribe to the free Microgrid Knowledge newsletter. 

Share Button

Comments

  1. Once again it’s the “middleman” pundit for aggregation or the utility controlled asset from the IOU electric utilities. When one sees a pundit of $1,000/MWh then say, no, it should be $2,000/MWh there is a middleman wanting in the game for their profit not the owner/adopter of the technologies benefit. If the homeowner or business owner is going to pay it forward, why opt into a market scenario, with more than likely discharge and charge costs to the technology owner. Might as well become self consuming and able to time shift self capacity to forego TOU rates or demand charges. Using excuses like the “duck curve” IOU utilities are controlling the price of energy by curtailing “non-commodity” , non-fueled generation, then use fueled generation on the spot market as “fill in capacity” for the solar PV and or wind generation curtailed. Utilities should get paid for energy performance not assured return on investments that allows poor decisions leaving stranded assets on the backs of the ratepayers.

    • CA utilities divested their fossil powerplants in 2000 during deregulation. They retained nuke and hydro. PG&E only added Gateway Generation station due to blackout restoration to the bay area. So, that leaves the utility electric assets comprised of lines and substations for which they must lobby the CPUC every year for customer’s penalty tier funds by reducing SAIDI and SAIFI. Hence, CA utilities are paid for energy delivery performance. The third party generator owners are controlling the price through the market, not the utilities that own the lines and substations (T&D surcharges that are depicted on bills). The environmentalist politicians that have no concept of reliability have created this separation and weakness. Generators, CCA’s and Microgrid operators then can exploit the weakness to make the middleman money.