Why Arizona Public Service Sees Microgrid Investments as Risk Worthy

Utilities are notoriously risk adverse. So why did Arizona Public Service (APS) take a chance on microgrid investments, not once but twice?

microgrid investments

Ribbon cutting for a microgrid at the Marine Corps Air Station Yuma

By take a chance, we mean the utility chose to install two microgrids without getting pre-approval for cost recovery from state regulators. So if the Arizona Public Service Commission now disapproves the microgrid investments – after the fact — APS shareholders foot the bill.

It’s the kind of bold move that utilities often shy away from.

“We just felt like it was the right thing to do. Period,” said Scott Bordenkircher, APS director of T&D technology innovation and integration.

The APS customers wanted the microgrids, and they made sense from a business perspective, he explained during an interview with Microgrid Knowledge at last week’s DistribuTECH conference in San Diego.

The projects include a 25-MW military microgrid operating at an air station in Yuma, Arizona and a nearly complete 63-MW data center in Phoenix for Aligned Data Centers.

The public service commission is now reviewing the microgrid investments as part of of the utility’s larger rate case (E-01345A-16-0036), and expects to render a decision by July 31.

Microgrids are the “right thing to do” for APS because they pencil under its business model – not just for the customer directly served by the microgrid, but also for the utility’s overall system, Bordenkircher said.

For the customer, the microgrid provides back-up power without a lot of headache. APS handles everything from fuel contracts to testing of controls and maintenance.

And for APS as a whole, the microgrid averts more costly investments to strengthen the grid. When not generating back-up power for the customer, the microgrid provides a stack of grid services, among them capacity, peaking capacity, voltage regulation, frequency response, and spinning reserve.

By offering the services less expensively than alternative investments, the microgrid benefits all APS customers, averting greater pressure on their rates.

Thus, the microgrid is not “an adder. It is a replacement. And it is replacement at much less cost,” Bordenkircher said.

Microgrid investments spur economic development

In addition, microgrids foster economic development, he said. APS, which serves most of the state, sees microgrids as a draw for data centers and similar businesses dependent on high quality power.

In fact, APS’ willingness to invest in a microgrid was part of the reason Aligned chose Phoenix.

“They were going to need the back-up generators one way or the other. They could either pay full price or they could pay 50 percent of the price — which was where their share came out. So, that was definitely an assistance in bringing them to our area,” he said.

To make the APS economic model work, the microgrid must be islandable, so that the local customer has back-up power when the grid fails. The microgrid also must run parallel to the grid and be dispatchable 24/7 to provide the grid with services when they are needed.

Why did Arizona Public Service take a chance on #microgrids, not once but twice?Click To Tweet

Given that each party benefits, the customer pays for part of the microgrid, and APS the rest. The utility rate filing puts the Yuma military microgrid cost at $21.6 million and the data center microgrid at $5.6 million.

Will APS stop at these two projects? No, the utility is searching for other microgrid partnerships, particularly customers that need back-up generation, among them defense/critical infrastructure facilities, other data centers and municipal services.

“Long term – especially given the kind of success we’ve had so far in the construction cycle and the testing and the way things are looking — it is definitely a model that we would like to pursue,” he said. “We are really hoping for a positive outcome from the commission.”

In fact, Bordenkircher sees microgrids as a good play for the utility industry in general, and expects to see a heightening in microgrid investments.

“To me, it represents a new business model for utilities that I think can bring significant value to all utility customers if you do it right, if you site it at the right location, if you build the right type of system,” he said.

He added: “Again it comes down to doing the penciling and doing the math and saying, ‘Economically is this viable? Is it the right thing?’ We’re confident we are on the right side.”

Track the latest on microgrid investments by subscribing to the Microgrid Knowledge newsletter. It’s free.

Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest microgrid news and analysis.
Elisa Wood About Elisa Wood

Elisa Wood is the chief editor of MicrogridKnowledge.com. She has been writing about energy for more than two decades for top industry publications. Her work also has been picked up by CNN, the New York Times, Reuters, the Wall Street Journal Online and the Washington Post.

Trackbacks

  1. […] in Illinois rejected legislation that would have allowed Commonwealth Edison to do the same. In Arizona and elsewhere utilities have decided to go forward with microgrids and take the risk that state […]

Leave a Comment

*